• zero drop (same sole height between the heel and midfoot)
• extra roomy forefoot
• cushioning and protection
• bringing un-sexy back

Altra is small Utah based company (their story) that delivered its initial zero drop road shoes early in 2011 and the Lone Peak late last Fall. I purchased a pair of their trail tread in early December and have scampered over 100 miles on…

technical terrain

groomed terrain

walked on water…didn’t work…still fun

enjoyed some of this during the middle of my trail adventure

Before we get to my thoughts on the ride, let’s learn a bit more about this unique pair of trail running tread.

Specs of Interest

The Basics

• Weight: 11.3 oz (size 9 per Running Warehouse)
• Ride height: 0 mm heel-to-forefoot difference
• No significant arch/medial support
• Special underfoot protection (plates in midsole, etc): StoneGuard

Big Boned

The Lone Peak is not your slipper, minimalist trail shoe. I would consider it in the moderate weight category. Coming from INOV-8 X-Talon 212 (~7.5 ounce) as my recent go-to shoe, I would compare the Lone Peak as a steady and strong diesel locomotive versus a spunky and responsive Ferrari (212′s). Get that baby in motion and she is going to stay in motion.

Bring the Zero Drop

The big bang feature of the Lone Peak’s is no difference in heel and midfoot sole thickness/height. Nada. Zero. 0 mm. Zilch. Forget about it!

Most traditional shoes have a heel-to-forefoot difference in the 12 mm range. What does this mean? More traditional shoes will have a wedge shape where the sole of the heel is 12 mm thinker than the sole of the midfoot/forefoot. The Lone Peak has thrown a giant boulder at that difference and made it a nice and simple zero millimeters which in Altra’s view allows for a more natural foot/ground contact (landing under center of mass (mid foot/forefoot), no/less heel striking).

INOV-8 Roclite 315 (9 mm drop) and Altra Lone Peak

I will have to say regardless of shoe / no-shoe, foot/ground contact is still 100% up to you. I have seen runners wearing VFF’s initiate ground contact with the heel on every stride.

Keep it Simple – Minimal Support

No big plastic or beefed up midsole on the inside/medial area of the shoe. The design is to let the foot function how it is naturally meant to function.

Protect thy Feet

Tucked within the moderately thick midsole is the StoneGuard. StoneGuard is designed keep the feet smilin’ when you step on a sharp rock or root.

Another aspect of the shoe is the tired feet piggy protection at the front of the shoe where the outsole wraps up the nose of the shoe. Stiff and firm protection for the late-in-the-race rock and root monsters.

Freeeedom….Freeeedom – Fit

The Lone Peak easily has the largest amount of toe freedom in the forefoot of any shoe I have worn. Most all shoes will taper throughout the forefoot, the Lone Peak has minimal taper and comes close to simply rounding off the shoe at the nose of the shoe. This can seem a bit clown-ish but that is quickly forgotten once laced up and scampering along a great trail.

INOV-8 Roclite 315, Altra Lone Peak, INOV-8 X-Talon 212

While roomy in the front, the heel and midfoot can be firmly snugged into place.

The Subtle Bite – Outsole

The moderate to low-profile teeth/lugs on the outsole are designed to provide flat/uphill traction as well as gnarly, steep downhill support for when you need to sit back on your heels a bit.  This multi-terrain support is due to the unique and opposite lug shape in the midfoot/forefoot and heel area.

The tail of the outsole also has a rudder hanging off the back of the shoe and is designed to provide support for really steep descents. I don’t sense much benefit of this extra material and it simply adds more weight. My trusty pocket knife it will likely see. Sorry Mr. Rudder.

Mr. Rudder

The tread is also made from a sticky rubber that has more biting power when navigating technical terrain which can be nice. Often sticky rubber will wear down quicker but after 100+ miles, my tread still looks nearly new. Good sign!

The Trail Experience

After running over a variety of terrain over the last 100 miles with adventures up to around 15 miles (so far) on these shoes I can easily say I am a fan. Initially they look and feel a bit goofy with that big piece of shoe in the forefoot.

And this too, shall pass.

They may also claim honors as the top un-sexy shoe in the market…which somehow makes it kind of sexy and cool…kind of…well. Let’s just say the shoe is more function than fashion. It’s what’s inside that counts…or something like that.

As far as sizing, I stuck with my usual size 12. Good fit.

For me, the transition to this zero drop style was quick and without fanfare. Coming from a 6 mm drop INOV-8 shoe, I had no calf or Achilles sensations. Of course everyone has to travel their own path but this was a pleasant surprise for me.

The wiggle room in the toe box was nice, and Big through Little Piggy all gave a positive grunt.

Across technical (rooty and rocky) terrain, the midsole and StoneGuard buffering seemed near ideal for me. I still received some sensory feedback (pressure) in the foot but no O’shucks (or similar) moments.

I really dig the firmness of the midsole. I do not like a squishy, sloppy, where-am-I shoe/midsole. The Lone Peak really nails this feature and with the included A-bound layer (the thinner dark blue layer above the grey midsole layer) that is supposed to compress 2-3 times less than traditional foam, I should also see less trenching (midsole breakdown) within the shoe over time. When running my fingers through the inside of the shoe I can feel a little compression in the forefoot area but nothing significant.

The firm toe protection at the front of the shoe also came in handy a couple times. Dig it.

How does the Lone Peak handle the wet stuff?

Splashing through multiple water crossing, the shoe drained very well but seemed to stay moist for quite a while. This didn’t affect the performance/ride of the shoe but was noticeable.

For some, the weight of the shoe is no biggie but the weight change was definitely noticeable coming from the INOV-8 X-Talon 212. Although within a couple miles on the trail I no longer noticed it. To be fair I probably wouldn’t place the Lone Peak and 212 in the same trail shoe category but I think everyone would benefit from a light trail shoe that provides the appropriate or desired amount of protection for the individual. I would love to see the same firm and moderate midsole but somehow reduce the weight by a couple ounces.

And if I am making a wish list, I would include a more flexible sole.

As far as being multi-purpose (road and trail), I would consider it a straight-up trail shoe. I would think the sticky(softer) rubber lugs may wear down pretty quick on the concrete/pavement.

As someone that likes a less wedgy / more flat shoe but also appreciates some firm cushioning, the Altra Lone Peak provides that go-all-day…and night ride. And what a sweet ride it is.

Running Form Support

One thing I really like about Altra is they offer multiple formats of tips and support to gradually transition to a none heel strike gait if that is new to you.

Under the cover of the shoe box – BAM!

Education pamphlet inside the box – BAM!

And if you need to hear more of the same, the Altra website contains this info as well.

And the info is brief and simple to understand!

Summary

The Altra Lone Peak is a moderate weight zero drop trail shoe that can smile and grit its teeth through a wide range of dirt lovin’ terrain while providing an extremely roomy toe box and a moderate amount of firm cushioning and object protection. This shoe seeks adventure!

The trail runner that would most dig the Altra Lone Peak:

• interested in zero drop tread
• wants forefoot/toe box roominess
• accepts a moderate weight shoe
• would like firm cushioning and object protection
• desires minimal support
• will keep it off-road

Btw, Altra also makes a female version of the shoe that is also called the Lone Peak (with light blue trim and stitching).

Share your thoughts!

Who else has worn the Altra Lone Peak trail shoe? What are your thoughts on the shoe?

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• Then check out the Altra Lone Peak!

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

Related Articles:

• INOV-8 X-talon 212 Trail Running Shoe Review
• Nathan Endurance Race Vest – Trail Running Gear Review
• CamelBak Octane LR Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review
• Nathan Sprint Water Bottle – Trail Running Gear Review
• Merrell Trail Glove – Initial Impressions

Ground-hugging feel.

Surprisingly protective.

You want an elevator speech for the INOV-8 X-talon 212 trail running shoes. There it is!

INOV-8 X-talon-212 trail running shoe with a big smile!

For those that want to hear more…let’s go for a run.

I have been running in the X-talon 212s for six months now. Completed the Cross Timbers trail half marathon, Jemez 50 km, and countless training adventures in these sleek dirt lovin’ shoes. This review is long overdo…let’s get dirty!

Specs of Interest

The Basics

• Weight: Spec’d at 7.5 oz (size 9, per Running Warehouse)
• Ride height: 6 mm heel-to-forefoot difference (INOV-8 two arrow)
• Neutral shoe (no significant amount of arch/medial foot support)
• Special Underfoot protection (plates in midsole, etc): none

Weight

At 7.5 ounces (size 9), the X-talon 212 is a feathery light and extremely responsive trail shoe. Don’t let its narrow waistline agility fool ya, this shoe is all trail.

Ride Height

INOV-8 uses an arrow system that represents the amount of cushioning and heel-to-forefoot difference. Their shoes run from zero arrow (least cushioning, zero heel-to-forefoot difference), up to four arrow (most cushioning, 12 mm heel-to-forefoot difference).

The X-talon 212 is a 2-arrow shoe and has less cushioning than the INOV-8 Flyroc 310 (~2.5 arrow – my review) or Roclite 315 (3 arrow – my review) as well as the lower-profile 6 mm drop.

Support

Minimal – nuff said.

Protection

While there is no special material or plate included within the midsole to protect against trail objects such as misplaced rocks and roots that somehow find their way on our trails, this shoe provides a surprising amount of protection for a spunky trail shoe.

How is this possible?

The aggressively lugged outsole provides a significant amount of buffering protection. They simply absorb some of the contact force or create a slight amount of clearance from the main rubber outsole material.

One additional place of protection is for the little piggies at the front of the shoe. A small section of outsole rubber wraps up the front of the shoe. This rubber has a firm protective feel that can help protect or buffer many accidental rock or root kisses.

Some Piggy Protection.

Fit

The X-talon 212 is designed with their Performance Last style which means the shoe is more formfitting as compared to the Endurance Last (ex: flyroc 310 and roclite 315). Still a fair amount of toe wiggle room. I wear a size 12 in the X-talon which is the same size I wear for the flyroc 310 and roclite 315. I have noticed I need to synch up the laces a bit more with the flyroc 310 and roclite 315 as compared to the X-talon (Performance Last), in order to create the fit I prefer.

Bird's eye view of roclite 315, flyroc 310, and x-talon 212.

The X-talon 212 also has a very comfortable glove-like feel and you can definitely notice less shoe when compared to the flyroc and roclite…as it should! The 212 has a less restrictive upper, lower profile (less midsole material and lower mm heel-to-forefoot drop), and weighs ~30% less.

Outsole – Tread

The 212′s outsole uses the INOV-8 Sticky Rubber Compound which offers a bit more grip as compared to their Endurance Compound, but does wear down quicker.

The most notable feature of the outsole are the aggressive lugs. They have been known to growl on occasion…just saying!

The undercarriage.

The Trail Experience

The X-talon is a shoe that thrives on the dirt!

The two races I wore them in this Spring include a trail half marathon and 50 km that included plenty of rocky technical running and I think I actually saw the darn shoes smiling.

Smilin' on the trails in New Mexico.

The lighter weight provides a seriously fun spunky feel and a good amount of trail feedback. I was actually surprised at the amount of sharp-object protection/buffering these shoes provided…thanks to those snarlin’ lugs (I believe). Of course, if you step on some rock in just the right manner, you will receive a louder “hello!” as compared to a more protected, heavier, and built-up shoes…as you should. But for the weight, it dominates!

That extra rubber at the toe is a nice little feature when the feet get a little lazy and has come in handy a couple times. Thank you Mr. X-talon 212 Piggy Protector.

Also, without the extra plates and protection in the midsole, the shoe is also quite flexible which provides very little resistance to your foots natural movement when running.

So, what about those skinny laces?

Honestly, they made me cringe when first looking at them. What are these wimpy, spaghetti laces?!? In action, the darn things once tied, stay tied. In the 100s of miles I have put on these shoes I have never had to re-tie the shoe mid-run. I like my skinny, wimpy laces!

While the X-talon is great trail shoe, it is less than an ideal road shoe with those beefy lugs. So it’s not a great all-purpose shoe. I have ran on short segments of sidewalk and will run in them in the grass at parks but this shoe really lives, breathes, and belongs, in the dirt world.

On the trails, this shoe really over delivers for such a lightweight package. I’ve really enjoyed the miles!

Summary

The INOV-8 X-talon 212 is a lightweight, ground-hugging trail shoe that has a feathery feel yet is not afraid to mix it up on the technical terrain. The comfortable glove-like fit seamlessly integrates the foot and shoe for miles of off-road smiles.

The trail runner that would most dig the X-talon 212:

• Desires a lightweight, lower-profile trail shoe, with good ground feedback that includes some object protection.
• Is fine with a more fitted fit from heel to midfoot. Those with really wide feet may have trouble with this shoe.
• Doesn’t desire large amounts of cushioning.
• Desires minimal support.
• Plans to use it as an off-road shoe and not an all purpose running shoe.

Who else has worn the INOV-8 X-talon 212? What are your thoughts on the shoe?

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• Then you can jump to the INOV-8 X-talon 212.

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

Related Articles:

• Altra Lone Peak Trail Shoe Review
• Inov-8 Flyroc 310 – Trail Running Shoe Review
• Nathan Endurance Race Vest – Trail Running Gear Review
• CamelBak Octane LR Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review
• Nathan Sprint Water Bottle – Trail Running Gear Review

Photo by David Pearson at Hyde State Park, NM

As a runner that will often carry some stuff (camera, additional calories, electrolytes, etc) during longer trail runs, I was most curious to test out the pack’s vest-style storage capabilities and how it integrated with running.

As a fan of the CamelBak Octane series (review of XCT and LR) that contains a nice amount of storage in the waist pockets, how would it feel to have these same items stored along your chest on the Nathan pack?

Would my chest sound like a beating drum as my bring-along items slap against my torso on every stride? While this beating may provide a nice metronome cadence for your fellow runners, this is not a cool point feature for a pack.

Fortunately my experience has been very positive so far.

Let’s meet the Nathan Endurance Race Vest!

Glamour Shot

Smile!

The Trail Lovin’ Features…with Pockets-O-Plenty

What aspects of this trail running pack caught my attention?

Ultra-Ready Moderate Size

The Nathan pack contains a 70 ounce bladder, has a minimalist-like size, and contains close to equal amounts of storage opportunities on both the front and back of the pack. The main pack body sizes up very closely with the CamelBak Octane XCT.

You will also see multiple points of adjustability (one front, two on each side) to create the right fit for you.

back

front

Two-Fisted Backside Storage

The storage pocket on the back includes a kangaroo pouch and my always commended key clip. You will get about two stacked moderate fists worth of run support storage.

You will also see below the pocket a Shock Cord with a one pull tension lock system to help hold a thin jacket or other items.

Buffet Style Front-side Storage with Added Hydro Capacity

What storage would you like? The pack will likely have it.

The front-side area contains two smaller pockets higher up on the vest. One pocked is waterproof with a velcro’d flap and is two inches in length. This would likely be useful for electrolyte tablets or items of that size. How many electrolytes can be packed inside? Surprisingly, I was able to stuff 20 Endurolytes inside the pocket…with some room still available!

The other small pocket is more of an elastic Kangaroo pouch that could hold a couple gels.

Below the elastic K-pounch you will see a 6 inch long by 3 inch wide zippered pocket that contains an elastic K-pouch attached to the outside of it. The zippered pocket could hold cellphone, camera, additional nutrition, etc.

The K-pouch would be useful to hold a gel flask or something of that size/shape.

The final storage area is a  5 inch long by 3 inch wide elastic open-top pocket with a one-pull tension lock that can help close the pocket or hold items in place. This is also where you could carry an extra bottle (22 oz) if desired. Kind of cool if you really need the extra fluids! Also, the bottle will not interfere with access to the waterproof pocket above it.

pocket with extra hydration

Show me the Bladder!

First, easy Velcro flap with dual zippered access to the bladder.

The bladder itself actually contains ounce/liter markings if you want to know exactly how much fluid you are consuming or adding. This could also be useful if adding powder calories with water to a bladder that was already partially filled. (ex: Add 100 cals of powder per 20 ounces of water.)

To fill the bladder you need to undo the Slideseal top enclosure. At first glance I was a bit wrinkled brow. Huh, that is different, especially when used to the CamelBak bladders.

Basically the Slideseal reminds me of a mechanical zip-lock baggie / chip-clip system.

Clip partially slid off.

fill 'er up

The system works, no leaks, and contains a clip leash so you don’t lose the slide on/off clip…but dang a different approach – yes indeed!

If you haven’t heard enough about bladders yet, I want to show you the most critical part – the drink valve. The valve can be twisted to enable or disable the ability to pull fluids. Simple to use! I also would consider the flow rate to be a bit less than current CamelBak bladders.

The Trail Lovin’ Experience

So how does the pack perform on the trail? Honestly, it was a rough start!

Full bladder, cellphone, camera, Food bar, and a few Endurolytes. Let’s run!

After about 20 meters down the trail – STOP. The pack was moving all around, need to adjust the side straps. One problem, the straps don’t adjust on-the-fly. I tugged, pulled, talked nicely to the pack – nada. So I had to take the pack off in order to get the fingers fully involved to adjust the two straps on each side of the pack.

Alright, pack back on. Let’s run!

30 meters down the trail – STOP. The pack was still dancin’ too much. Tug, pull, less nice words expressed…take the pack off. Adjust, adjust, adjust, adjust (four side straps remember) – done!

Pack back on. Lets try walking…feels good. Lets try running…still feels good. The pack was dialed in!

Why the adjustment difficulty? The Nathan pack uses thicker straps than other systems such as CamelBak. While the thinner straps on the CamelBak allow for easy on-the-fly adjustability, you often (at least I do) have to periodically re-snug up the straps during a run. I have yet to re-adjust the side straps on the Nathan pack since the first run. They seem to be securely locked into position due to their thicker nature.

One final tweak was sliding the chest strap down a bit lower on the vest to eliminate any type of drum beating from the filled front pockets against my body.

Since the initial adjustments, the pack has felt great on the trails.

The bladder is also extremely easy to clean since you can place your entire hand inside to remove any remaining funk.

Photo by David Pearson at Hyde State Park, NM

Final Thoughts

The Nathan Endurance Race Vest is comfortable and contains storage options that would work well for many trail running adventures. The bladder is a bit wacky but still functions as you would expect. My initial set of experiences with a Nathan pack have been a good one!

Also if you are a runner that doesn’t like straps around your waist, this pack provides the storage flexibility without the belly pressure.

Trail runners that would be most interested in the Nathan Endurance hydration pack:

• 70 ounce bladder with optional flexibility to carry another 22 ounce bottle.
• Desires a variety of small to moderate storage options with a significant amount of access on the front of your body.
• Desires waist-free strapping.
• Will have to develop a bit of proficiency if desire quick bladder refills.

Anyone else use this pack? What are your thoughts?

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the additional discount noted in your shopping cart.
• You can then jump to the Nathan Endurance Race Vest.

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• CamelBak Octane LR Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review
• Nathan Sprint Water Bottle – Trail Running Gear Review
• Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit – Running Gear Review
• Inov-8 Flyroc 310 – Trail Running Shoe Review
• CamelBak Octane XCT Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review

Chlorinated, chemically tasting water – not so good.

Disposable filtered water bottle – not so good.

Reusable filtered water bottle – good.

As someone that prefers filtered water for myself and family but gets nauseous with the thought of purchasing disposable filtered water bottles, I was quite interested when CamelBak offered the opportunity to test out their new portable filtered water bottle system called the CamelBak Groove.

The Groove holds 20 ounces of hydrating goodness and is available in both a BPA-free plastic and a stainless steel version. The stainless steel version arrived on my doorstep.

After a couple months of use, let’s check it out.

Out of the Box

First observations were that the Groove had a real sturdy look and feel to it and I dig the stainless steel look. Clip hook was a nice bonus.

To enjoy a filtered pull – The familiar CamelBak Bite Valve can be pivoted upwards and recessed back into the cap when not in use. The Bite Valve also easily pops off when you want to remove any funky build-up or give it a good scrub down.

The filtration system is basically a giant plug-and-hydrate straw. The plant-based (coconut) carbon filter (one filter included) simply slides into the belly of the straw and attaches to the cap. Pretty simple. Also, if you don’t have a filter, the bottle can still be used as a standard water bottle.

Of note, the carbon filter is for potable tap water only and not for extreme environments or funky hydration concoctions. It is tested (NSF/ANSI Standard 42) for the reduction of chlorine, taste, and odor. I would consider it more of a finishing filter. Each filters is spec’d to last 2-3 months depending on use.

I do have to say one thing about the packaging box. As an environmentally friendly designed product (use less plastic water bottles), I would prefer much, much less packaging. I don’t see anything mentioned about the packaging being made from recycled material either. Anyway…’nuff said.

The Groove-n Experience

Over the last couple months I have had a dozen or so adventures where I would be away from home most of the day and the Groove worked sweet for these situations.

Instead of drinking directly from a water fountain (or consider purchasing filtered water in a plastic bottle), I would refill the Groove and enjoy a very clean tasting water. As a little test, I drank directly from the water fountain and could taste the strong chlorine in the water. No likely! Take a pull from the Groove – ahh nice!

Leakage Testing

In my attempt to give it a thorough shakedown…literally…I tipped it upside down and on it side (with some gentle shakes) and watch for leakage. Nothing leaked out of the Bite Valve but I was able to create a noticeable amount of leakage where the cap and stainless steel bottle meet. I am guessing the water is moving out along the plastic threads of the bottle/cap.

Looking at the inside of the cap, there is no rubber casket of any sort to create a nice seal so the BPA-free plastic-on-plastic likely allows some small gaps for aqua to sneak out if the bottle doesn’t remain in a mostly vertical position. Many situations not a big deal but if in a backpack for example and the bottle gets bounced around…that may not be so cool sitting next to your iPod.

Final Thoughts

My entire family always bring along filled stainless steel bottles of water from our home based filtration system whenever we head out for some errands or short adventures. For those days when the bottles run dry, the CamelBak Groove provides a useful option that delivers a cleaner tasting water and reduces the need to purchase a disposable bottle…just be careful how you transport it.

Cost: $25 (BPA-free Plastic Bottle), $35 (BPA-free Stainless Steel Bottle)

Replacement filters: $25 (6-pack), $10 (2-pack)

The Groove and replacement filters are also available on Amazon.

Get Your Groove On – Win a Free CamelBak Groove

Want your own CamelBak Groove?

CamelBak is providing a free stainless steel Groove and to get your name placed into the mostly clean trail shoe drawing all you have to do is comment and answer the following question.

When would you most often use the Groove?

For those interested in a little bonus fun…include a favorite Groove-n tune – a song that has you toe-tappin’, head noddin’, or movin’ like a funky chicken. No videos required…although may be kind of fun.

The giveaway will close at midnight CST on Sunday April 17. The CamelBak Groove winner will be notified on Monday April 18.

[4/18 - Drawing Winner]

Using an Excel spreadsheet and the unbiased and a bit boring random number generator, the winner of the CamelBak Groove is…

Rick Emery!

Thanks to all those that entered and huge thanks to CamelBak for providing the free Groove.

I must say I also really enjoyed the music you all shared. Thanks for playing along. I hadn’t heard of the Paper Tongues…really dug the tune.

Be active – Feel the buzz!

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[The article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz]

Related Articles:

• No Related Post

The folks at CamelBak were kind enough to provide a pack to test and review. After nearly three months of dirt, rocks, roots, races, and a few diggers, it was time to share my thoughts on this pack and also provide some  comparison with a favorite pack of mine from the Octane family – the CamelBak Octane XCT.

Glamour Shot

CamelBak Octane LR

Most Groovy Features

What aspects of the newest member of the Octane family caught my attention like a revolving disco ball on a Saturday night?

Full figured shape

This pack isn’t a 70 ounce water bottle attached to your back. The pack has a handful of storage options to fill a variety of possible needs and adventure while still supporting your ability to run.

backside

front-side

Junk in the trunk…and the front

How much storage? The Octane LR has 549 cubic inches of available storage space. I would consider it a moderate amount of room and contains over double the space available on the more minimalist Octane XCT (200 cubic inches).

Where can you store nutrition, clothing, lights, maps, a soprano ukulele, and other adventure goodies?

Two waist pockets. (One on each side)

External kangaroo storage

Two zippered storage pockets towards the upper area of the pack. (One open pocket shown above.) The pockets overlay on top of one another. One pocket has more storage space than the other.

Additional small harness kangaroo pouch. Can fit a gel flask, thin/small cellphone, etc.

I did mention there were some storage options, right?

Funkadelic bladder

The Lumbar Antidote Reservoir has as its own unique style. The hydration bladder sits low in the pack along your hips/waist which allows you to pack a bit more up-top.

General position of the lumbar reservoir in the pack.

Dual zippered access.

The final most notable feature of the Antidote reservoirs is the Quick-Link System. Simple click-in connectivity allows you to swap out tubes if desired (ex – insulated tube for cold weather).

Quick Link System

Keepin’ it real

The Octane LR has all your standard feature you would expect from a run pack:

• multiple points of adjustability
• A dash of reflective safety

We cannot forgot one of my favorite cool points feature…the key clip. The Octane LR has it (in a waist pocket)!

The Groovin’ and Movin’ Experience – Plus Share and Compare versus the Octane XCT

I have worn the Octane LR pack on many trail adventures including a fun race down in Bandera. As is typical with other CamelBak packs I have worn, comfort is not an issue. I am a huge fan of the waist pockets and similarly to the Octane XCT, they are positioned more towards your back-side and require a bit of access-by-feel or an extremely twisty upper body. Not a big deal (to me), plus my arms are able to swing freely near my body without having to arc around the pockets.

The most notable pack observations revolve around the Lumbar Antidote reservoir.

The first is pack pressure. When the reservoir is filled, the majority of pack pressure is around your waist/lower back along the reservoir. The typical CamelBak reservoir pack pressure runs along your mid-back/spine. The waist pressure isn’t uncomfortable, just noticeable. Of course, as you drink the pressure dissipates as well.

The second observation is the art of the fill (when out of the pack). Compared to the standard reservoir, it requires a bit more elegance and grace to fill up the Lumbar Antidote Reservoir due to those fillable wings on each side of the cap. It is even more of a challenge to completely fill the reservoir when it is in the pack due to the pack pressure on the wings of the reservoir. The pack fabric and any items you may have in your waist pockets will reduce the ability to fill the reservoir up completely. I would recommend taking the bladder out of the pack completely if looking for a full fill.

For those interested in the Octane LR and the Octane XCT, here are the big diffs.

• Octane LR has quite a bit more storage space. (549 cubic inches versus 200 cubic inches – significant)
• The LR has 70 ounce reservoir, the XCT (2011) 100 ounce.
• In a race environment, the standard XCT bladder is easier to fill.
• The LR reservoir does push out some into the waist pockets especially when the reservoir is full.
• Pack pressure with full reservoir: LR – waist/lower-back, XCT – mid-back/spine.

Final Thoughts

I really dig the CamelBak Octane LR’s flexibility to support both basic and more complex running adventures. As with the XCT, I am a big fan of the waist pockets. The x-factor for some will  be the reservoir system which can be awkward and slow(er) to refill under certain situations.

Trail runners that would be most interested in the Octane LR pack:

• Desire 70 ounce reservoir capacity.
• Desire a moderate amount of storage possibilities in a wide range of configurations.
• Is OK with pack pressure alone the waist/lower-back when the reservoir is full.
• Don’t require quick on-the-fly reservoir refills.

Anyone else use this pack? What are your thoughts?

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• You can then jump to the Octane LR pack.

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[The pack was provided by CamelBak but the review is purely my own. ]

[This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• Nathan Endurance Race Vest – Trail Running Gear Review
• Nathan Sprint Water Bottle – Trail Running Gear Review
• Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit – Running Gear Review
• Inov-8 Flyroc 310 – Trail Running Shoe Review
• CamelBak Octane XCT Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review

If you are curious about these fun trail ready minimalist shoes, be sure to check out my initial impressions of the Merrell Trail Glove.

Color options available for the Trail Glove:

• Smoke/Yellow
• Amazon
• Black/Lava
• Olympia

(Smoke/Yellow)

If you don’t see the remaining color options displayed on the Running Warehouse site, I have been told they will be on display soon. The product is in-house, the website is catching up.

Color options available for the Pace Glove:

• Lavender
• Black
• Acacia

(Clockwise: Lavender, Black, and Acacia)

• Click Running Warehouse and submit the Endurance Buzz discount code. The 10% discount will be noted in your shopping cart.
• Then check out the shoes!

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• Dirt and Distance Bites: Trail Running Clinic – Grand Slam of Trail Running – Trail Running Shoe Choices Expanding in 2011
• Merrell Trail Glove – Initial Impressions

Glamour Shot

I thought I would give a breakdown of the bottle and some of my key observations during its initial 13.5 mile adventure test over the weekend.

Unique Features of the Bottle

Check out some of the most dominating features.

Mini-me Size but Big Mouth

Most handheld water bottles hold 20-ish ounces of fluid but the Nathan Sprint holds 10 ounces. It is small-er and more compact than your typical bottle.

Just slightly bigger than my hand.

For a small bottle, it sure has a big mouth…and that is a good thing. This makes it very easy to fill, refill, and clean.

Buckle Up…Comfortably!

An adjustable velcro strapping system locks that hand snuggly against the bottle. My wife also snugged up the bottle and it felt great for tiny hands as well.

Strap slides through loop and attaches to the velcro shown.

One added comfort bonus is the felt-like material that covers the outer edges of the strap. They provide a very cozy fit when snugged up against your skin. Ahhh!

One Way Flow – Open Up!

The Race Cap contains a small rubber membrane that allows water to gush out when the bottle is squeezed.

The under-belly of the Sport Cap. Membrane visible.

Adventure Test Results

So how did it handle the 13.5 miles of trail racing bliss?

The Nathan Sprint water bottle fit extremely comfortably in my hand and due to its smaller capacity, felt very close to hands-free running (when full).

When squeezing the bottle, the fluid comes out like a rocket with a fair amount of flow rate. One moderate squeeze and I enjoyed a significant amount of hydration goodness.

Refilling was quick and painless.

Early miles with Nathan Sprint. You can barely see the darn thing.

I did have a problem with losing a bit of water a couple times. If I would put a little too much squeeze pressure on the bottle when running (especially with full bottle when not trying to drink), I created a couple unrequested water rockets.

I remedied this by resting my thumb over top of the spout which likely reduced the hand pressure. Maybe a membrane that required a bit more force before opening (allowing water flow) could further reduce this potential issue.

Overall, I felt the Nathan Sprint worked great for this shorter race situation where I wanted a small amount of water easily available but didn’t want to feel like I was carrying any.

I also know this handheld will be a great companion for shorter training runs or even various road events where I could be cup-free which I think would be pretty cool.

Who Would Most Likey?

You would likely dig the Nathan Sprint if you are looking for the following core handheld characteristics:

• Small – Are looking for a smaller handheld (10 ounce) that has a nearly hands-free feel.
• Secure – Like a simple, comfortable, and secure strapping system.
• Minimalistic – Don’t require storage space with the handheld.

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• Then go to the Hydration & Packs page.

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• Nathan Endurance Race Vest – Trail Running Gear Review
• CamelBak Octane LR Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review
• Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit – Running Gear Review
• Inov-8 Flyroc 310 – Trail Running Shoe Review
• CamelBak Octane XCT Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review

I have had the Trail Gloves for about a month of periodic wear that has consisted of  a full day of trail walking and a variety of shorter walks both in the dirt and on pavement. I haven’t done any running in them yet but plan to start gradually implementing short runs in them as a tool for general strengthening. I will say I already really, really enjoy walking in them off the pavement.

Some Basics

Lets keep this simple, we are talking about a minimalist trail shoe!

• Light – Well duh! 6.2 ounces.
• Flat – Zero mm drop.
• Feedback rich – 4 mm of midsole cushioning. Plenty of cross-talk between ground and feet.
• Feathery Forefoot Protection – 1 mm flexible forefoot absorption plate.

Bonus feature – foldable!

Minimal Trail Shoe – Significant Detail

For a simple shoe, there are quite a few details worth mentioning.

Snug Heel Through Midfoot Yet Wide Toebox

Sliding your feet into the Trail Glove and lacing them up, it becomes immediately apparent that the heel and midfoot areas of the foot…cough, cough…fit like a glove. I wouldn’t call it restrictive, simply comfortably snug.

Instead of a taper along the forefoot little piggies area, the toebox remains moderately wide to allow them little guys to dance around a bit if they want to.

You can check out the toebox difference as compared to a pair of cross country flats (Saucony Killkenny XC 3) I often wear when walking through the isles of Whole Foods.

Friction Free Heel Wrap

The thin and flexible faux leather lining around the heel/ankle provides a snug and comfortable fit with a sockless foot or if wearing a thin piece of foot clothing. No seams or stitching to dig into the skin.

Respectful Tongue

The lacing system attaches to the shoe tongue which prevents a few undesirable words from leaving your mouth because the tongue has shifted on you. It is going nowhere once laced up.

A Dash of Medial Support

The Trail Glove does provide a bit of medial (inside) support as the below picture highlights. I wouldn’t call it a huge amount but when compared against my cross country racing flat, it was noticeable.

Tread That Purrs and Bites

The Vibram outsole (no big surprise here), has a low-profile tread design until you get near the point of your little piggies then the tread becomes more defined and aggressive. I can almost hear it growl. I could see these fangs being useful for climbing hills and steep grades.

Purrrrrrrr

Do you see those teeth?!?

Never Leave a Toe Behind – Piggy Protection

Suprisingly enough these minimalist trail shoes provide a fair amount of smashed piggy protection. The rubber outsole wraps up the front of the shoe and provides a fair amount of cuss protection. I am not saying INOV-8 Flyroc 310 protection but a mini-me version of it.

My Experience…So Far

First sizing…I wore a size 12 in the Trail Glove. Fit perfectly for me. I normally wear between a 11.5 and 12, although I have been going with size 12 more consistently.

I normally run in 8-10 ounce trail shoes that have 6-10 mm of heel-to-forefoot drop so I haven’t gone all run crazy with these shoes. As initially mentioned, I haven’t ran in them at all yet but have enjoyed the heck out of them walking on trails and grassy surfaces. After my Bandera 25 km adventure run in January, I wore the Trail Gloves for eight hours at the park while walking along the trail, cheering on other runners. Loved the simple barefoot-ish feel.

My feet are definitely not toughened to wearing shoes without socks so I noticed one potential hot-spot area at the base of the tongue (shoe not mouth), around the forefoot area. The extra tongue fabric would rub against the top of my foot just prior to the start of my little piggies. This would occur when the shoe is flexed in the forefoot area. If I wore a thin pair of socks, I had no issues.

With respect to cushioning, I would consider it…well…minimal. Comparing to my cross country flats, the Trail Gloves definitely provide more ground feedback.

As a running tool or to enjoy some family time at the park, the Trail Gloves are both functional and a heck of a lot of fun in an off-road environment. I look forward to enjoying many more miles of walking, hiking, and eventually a bit of running.

Back to School! – Merrell Style

To assist with the transition to what will be significantly less shoe than most people wear on a daily basis, Merrell has released an initial set (more to come) of videos with minimalist runner Jason Robillard and personal trainer Walt Reynolds. The videos are designed to help with the transition to less shoe and will include foot strengthening exercises, how much – how often, and running form tips.

• Merrell Barefoot/minimalist video training tips
• Merrell’s Top 10 Tips for Beginners

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• Then check out the shoes!

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• Altra Lone Peak Trail Shoe Review
• INOV-8 X-talon 212 Trail Running Shoe Review
• Merrell Trail Glove and Pace Glove Now Available at Running Warehouse
• Dirt and Distance Bites: Trail Running Clinic – Grand Slam of Trail Running – Trail Running Shoe Choices Expanding in 2011
• Inov-8 Roclite 315 – Trail Running Shoe Review

Yes, Please!

Well unless you live with someone that has jedi master massage skills, this is likely not happenin’. For everyone else, Trigger Point Performance Therapy has a synergistic team of self-massage products that are described to be able to provide similar dream-like support.

With over 12 weeks of massage support with the Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit (with book and DVD), I want share my impressions of the team.

But first, who is Trigger Point Performance Therapy?

Trigger Point is a company based in the TALON region, with headquarters in Austin, Texas.

Company founder and passionate fitness enthusiast, Cassidy Phillips, created the foundation for the company while deep in his own search to relieve his own fibromyalgia discomfort. Cassidy found positive results with trigger point therapy but found it challenging to work on himself.

After finding a material that was firm, yet had a bit of give once pressure was applied, the Trigger Point products were born.

The Massage Team

The Ultimate 6 Kit contains the three main massage tools, a supporting foam block, 17-page spiral bound runners massage guide book, and a how-to/follow-along DVD. A handy little mesh bag can carry it all.

Let’s meet the team!

TP Massage Ball

Don’t let it’s small size fool ya, the Massage Ball is a hugely useful mobility tool. Its tennis ball size can provide focused massage work all over that body. It is also the tool that will likely produce the most intense feedback and strangest facial expressions as it works to loosen up those tight areas.

Some common uses for runners:

• Piriformis – That pain in the butt area.
• Psoas – Outer areas of the stomach between the belly button and hip bone.
• Calves
• Chest

TP Footballer

The Footballer is designed to work out the kinks in the soleus (lower calf) area of the lower leg which helps restore the natural range of motion of the foot and ankle. The six inch roller is designed to work with the foam Baller Block which provides the angle and clearance to really focus in on this region of the leg.

The Footballer could also be used to massage/stretch the bottom of the feet while standing.

Unless you have teeny tiny calves/legs, you will not be able to massage the upper calf with the Footballer.

TP Quadballer

The Quadballer is an 11 inch roller that can put a wide range of massage pressure throughout your quad region.

This tool requires the most body coordination, similar to the movement required if using a foam roller.

If wishing to massage the hamstrings you need to get a bit creative such as placing the Quadballer on a coffee table and sitting on it as your lower leg dangles off the edge. I read this in a comment on the Trigger Point blog and it worked moderately well for me. I still prefer kneading the relaxed (unloaded) muscles using my hands.

The Ultimate 6 for Runners Guidebook

This handy little 17 page guidebook provides how-to instructions to massage what Trigger Point define as the six important areas of the runner’s body. The guide focuses on the soleus, quadriceps, IT band, psoas, piriformis, and pectorals. Detailed, easy-to-follow instructions and pics are included to clearly highlight the what and the how for the six areas.

Page example

Ultimate 6 DVD

The DVD contains a 15 minute video version of The Utimate 6 for Runners Guidebook and a 30 minute follow-along class.

My Trigger Point U6 Experience

Ohhh…eeee…ahhhh!

The above fairly accurately describes my experience so far. If you need a bit more translation, keep reading!

The Trigger Point U6 products increase the breadth and depth of the foam roller massage experience. These massage tools simply allow a deeper, more focused massage experience and may just turn a tough, callused man into a sensitive, whimpering child…if just for a little while.

A tool is only useful if you know how to use it.

Fortunately, the Ultimate 6 for Runners Guidebook delivers. It is a great general maintenance instructional guide made from high quality heavy weighted paper. It was quite useful to have next to me when performing the exercises the first couple of times. After that, it is less useful since I pretty much have a routine rollin’.

The Footballer and the foam Baller Block were easy to use. Some areas around my soleus region are t-e-n-d-e-r. My feet/ankles always feel more springy when walking around the house after using the massage tool.

The Quadballer provided a nice deep massage throughout my quad region. I often find tender spots that I will spend a bit of extra time visiting. Over time, I noticed those hot spots reduced or went away.

You could perform both the Footballer and Quadballer massage movements with a foam roller but the massage is not nearly as deep. Everyone has various preferences/tolerances for this. If I had completely trashed my legs I would prefer the gentler foam roller but under normal happy-leg conditions, I prefer the depth focused massage work of the TP products.

The TP Massage Ball is the most versatile tool of the kit and my favorite. Besides doing a solid job massaging the periformis/gluteus region, soleus, and chest area, I have used it on various areas around the knee and all over the hips/waist/bumper area. Everywhere and anywhere I want to hit a very localized area – BAM!, the Massage Ball brings it!

The use of this little guy along with a few Mobility WODs had an immediate impact in improved functioning of my left leg/knee which I had messed up earlier in 2010. What did I notice?

• Eliminated creaky left hip joint – When I would rotate my left leg in a circular, hurdles-like motion, my hip joint would feel twingy/sticky…or arthritic. I thought I may have to live with this for the rest of my life. No longer! This was huge for me.
• Improved external rotation of left leg – While sitting on the ground, legs straight. Both legs now have the same external range of motion. My left leg used to stop earlier than the right leg. The left leg still feels tighter than the right at full rotation so I still have some work to do. I have also received similar results with a skilled massage therapist.
• Improved left leg alignment when running – I have been observing my running form a lot and had noticed my left femur would track inwards some with each stride…which I feel led to my tender knee. The very first trail run after the Massage Ball / Mobility WOD work, I noticed my left leg was moving in a more vertical range of motion, similar to my right leg. And guess what? My left knee was happy (no discomfort).

After the massage dust has settled, a full glass of water enjoyed, my body feels less tight and restricted. To me, that is a good thing.

Close to bomb proof – I thought it is also worth mentioning that the products seem very high quality and designed to last…unless you take a razor blade to the fabric.

I have watched The Ultimate 6 DVD but it is not something that I have continued to use. The two video segments (how-to and follow along routine) are well produced but the rockstar Guidebook clearly explains it all for me. I could have done without the DVD.

Final Thoughts

The Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit provides a conveniently accessible and portable set of massage tools that includes instructional guidance to support us – the runner. The ability to toss it in your suitcase when traveling or use it whenever the desire for a bit of general massage goodness strikes, makes it a very useful product. I have been using these tools every morning. I dig ‘em!

The DVD will benefit those that desire a follow along video routine. If you are already a foam roller user, the Footballer and Quadballer can deliver a similar but progressively deeper massage experience. That may or may not interest you.

Although a tool will never be able to replace the abilities of a skilled massage therapist, the Trigger Point Ultimate 6 kit does empower a runner with the ability to perform general sport-specific massage maintenance. And for that, I think it does a jedi master-like job.

You can also purchase Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit (with Book only) or various pieces of the kit and receive an Endurance Buzz visitor discount (10% at checkout) at Running Warehouse.

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• Then you can jump to the Injury Prevention and Recovery Page.

Be active – Feel the buzz!

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[The kit was provided by Trigger Point. The review is completely my own. This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• Nathan Endurance Race Vest – Trail Running Gear Review
• CamelBak Octane LR Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review
• Nathan Sprint Water Bottle – Trail Running Gear Review
• Inov-8 Flyroc 310 – Trail Running Shoe Review
• CamelBak Octane XCT Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review

Over the upcoming months I hope to provide more reviews to help differentiate the variety of trail running shoes offered by INOV-8.

In the moderate weight range, I have already reviewed the smooth running Roclite 315s. A few months back I purchased the Flyroc 310s, a shoes that is a close relative of the Roclite 315 yet has it’s own unique personality. After many a fun filled miles, it was time to share my findings and experience so far.

There will be no glamour shot in this review. The makeup, touch-ups, and artificial lights will stay in the closet for this one. Every pic is from my own worn and experience tread.

Let me introduce to you…the Flyroc 310.

Specs of Interest

The Basics

• Weight: spec’d at 10.9 ounces (size 9)
• Ride height (midsole): 16 mm (heel) / 7 mm (forefoot) (Per Running Warehouse)
• Pronation support: minimal (but not zero)
• Underfoot Protection: Terra Shank

Weight

At 10.9 ounces (size 9), the Flyroc 310 isn’t a racing flat or a beefier running shoe. It runs quite comfortably in that moderate weight range and is just slightly lighter than the Roclite 315 (spec’d at 11.1 ounces for size 9).

Ride Height

The shoe has a lower profile feel for a moderate weight trail shoe and has a slightly smaller midsole heel-to-forefoot difference of 9 mm. Simple midsole measurements don’t tell the whole story but based on eyeball observations and some simple external measurements, the Flyroc 310 has slightly less midsole thickness but slightly more outsole thickness than the Roclite 315. These two shoe components somewhat balance each other out leading to a very similar foot/body relationship with the ground between both shoes.

Support

Here you can see the midsole design that may provide a minimal amount of pronation/arch support. Don’t expect a lot though as it wouldn’t fit in INOV-8′s natural running philosophy. I have a friend that runs with the Brooks Adrenaline’s on the road which have a significant amount of “pronation” control, he said the Flyroc’s don’t come close to the same feel.

Protection

The Terra Shank is a molded stiff material that sits between the midsole (cushioning layer) and outsole (tread layer) to provide additional protection from those knarly rocks and pointy objects that may reside on the trails. This material runs from the heel to the metatarsal heads (the start of your cute little piggies). The front of the shoe, the toe box area, is surprisingly very flexible. (more flexible than the Roclite 315s)

Here is pic noting the length of the Terra Shank and tries to highlight the location of the flexible forefoot.

I think it is also worth noting the extra smashed toe protection at the tip of the shoe. The added outsole material provides a significant buffer to an improperly placed rock or root. I feel the Flyroc provides a bit more toe protection than the Roclite.

Fit

INOV-8 develops shoes using both a comfort fit or performance fit design style. As the name inplies, the comfort fit shoes are simply less tight around the foot and have a bit more wiggle room in areas like the toebox.

The Flyroc 310 is designed with a comfort fit similar to the Roclite 315s. My running shoes are either 11.5 or 12s. I went with size 12…as I did for the Roclites.

What can I say, I really dig the fit. The heel (using loop lock high lacing) and midfoot is snuggly secured along with a moderate amount of wiggle room for the toes.

The Flyroc 310 does feel like less shoe (and weighs less) as compared to the Roclite 315. The Flyroc’s upper is predominately a simple breathable mesh material that allows more subtle foot movements whereas the Roclite contains additional layers and material that provides more overall foot support. The outsole toe wrap and visibly beefy lugs on the Flyroc also provide a pre-run illusion of being a less spunky shoe…surprise!

Flyroc 310 and Roclite 315

Outsole – The Tread

The outsole has a moderately meaty tread pattern that uses INOV-8 Endurance compound that is designed to wear down slower as compared to their Sticky compound. The Flyroc’s lugs have approximately 5 mm of depth. Although the pattern is different on the Roclites, the lug depth is basically the same.

The Trail Experience

This is where the fun starts!

I have been on many 5 to 11+ mile trail adventures with the Flyroc 310s and even tossed on the pack to swap out with the Roclite 315 mid-run to try and Spidey sense any differences on the trail.

The Flyroc’s provide a fair amount of trail feedback on the flats and smooth terrain, and a surprisingly amount of protection/buffering when stomping on every root and sharp rock I could find. It’s an unexpected partnership. I would guess the object protection is due to the moderate sized tread pattern that absorbs some of the impact and I am sure the Terra Shank helps as well.

On a couple of occasions the extra toe protection prevented the bursting of a few low quality words.

How do the Flyroc 310s compare to the Roclite 315?

Here are my biggest observed differences on the trail:

• The Flyroc has slightly more trail feedback and the Roclite is slightly more cushioned. (This is with respect to well groomed, non-technical portions of trail.)
• The Flyroc has slightly more object protection/buffering than the Roclites. (This is with respect to the more technical portions of trail.)
• The Flyroc has a more flexible sole.
• The Flyroc’s Upper feels slightly less supportive.
• The Flyroc has slightly more toe protection.

Interested note with respect the cushioning of both shoes – I talked with a INOV-8 rep at TRE and mentioned my observation. Although both shoes are described as mid-level cushioning (3-arrow), the rep mentioned that the Flyroc likely sits between the low-level (2-arrow) and mid-level cushioning…like a 2.5-arrow (which doesn’t officially exist). It was nice to get a confirmation on my sensory observation.

I want to add a final thought on the cushioning. It is firm. No squishiness here.

My running adventures  in the Flyroc 310 have really been good ones. I like to have a heel-to-forefoot difference of 10 mm or less to help promote a midfoot/forefoot running style and this shoes fits nicely in this parameter. The Flyroc’s also have a nice all-purpose feel where it could handle some serious miles yet still be a bit spunky when called upon.

Summary

The Flyroc 310 is a moderate weight, low-er profile trail shoe that delivers a significant amount of trail feedback and object protection. It is designed for a relaxed fit that can take on some serious adventure miles or enjoy a nice lactic burn.

The Flyroc 310 is not a minimalist racing flat. It does not fit like some of the lighter and more snug trail racing shoes (ex: MT100/MT101) as there is definitely more shoe but there isn’t excessive shoe either. I also wouldn’t consider it an ideal road shoe. It’s all trail baby!

The trail runner that may most like this trail tread:

• desires a lower profile feel with a fair amount of trail feedback
• doesn’t need a significant amount of cushioning
• doesn’t need an abundance of support and “features”
• Can accept the moderate weight
• desires a more comfortable fit
• desires a solid amount of object protection

BAM! There ya go! Hopefully this sheds some natural light on the Flyroc 310 and how it differs from the Roclite 315.

Who else has worn the Flyroc 310s? Please share your thoughts in the comment link below!

Simply…

• Click Running Warehouse
• Submit the displayed Endurance Buzz visitor discount code. You will see the discount noted in your shopping cart.
• Then you can jump to the INOV-8 Flyroc 310.

David – EnduranceBuzz.com

[This article contains links that may support Endurance Buzz.]

Related Articles:

• INOV-8 X-talon 212 Trail Running Shoe Review
• Nathan Endurance Race Vest – Trail Running Gear Review
• CamelBak Octane LR Hydration Pack – Trail Running Gear Review
• Nathan Sprint Water Bottle – Trail Running Gear Review
• Trigger Point Ultimate 6 Kit – Running Gear Review